Thoughts on GMOs: an Interview with Dag Falck

This site is like a

This site is like a clasrsoom, except I don’t hate it. lol

gmo v organic

we’ve genetically modified all our food through the centuries by selective breeding of plants and animals - that we can now do it directly with gene technology is just another advance that’s not really different than selective breeding used previously - only now, we can select for specific traits instead of a random chance of the previous method

What is the reason to do

What is the reason to do Genetic modification ? There is no reason to do so, apart from making huge profits for Big agri business via patents or pesticides. If you think that GMO results in better yield, it’s a myth and proven false already as pests are integral part of nature and you remove one, some other pest will appear. The only way to control pest population is integrated pest management.

gmo v organic

Even though it is completely true that humanity has practiced selective breeding of plants and animals for eons of time, this does not equal the genetic engineering techniques used today. The differences lie not in the objectives being different (breeding or engineering for new or improved traits), but rather the difference is that the original (natural) selective breeding is limited by nature in that you cannot succeed in breeding two species unless they are the same or very closely related, for instance a horse with a donkey to produce a mule. If you tried to breed a horse with an elephant this would not work. Assuming that nature put these boundaries in place to protect a natural balance and to retain species pureness, it leaves us to question if we (humans) have the wisdom to judge whether overriding natures limits is indeed safe in the long run. Overriding the natural limits is exactly what genetic engineering does, and this is what makes organic proponents elect to avoid this technology. Just because we can do something does not mean that it’s the right thing to do. Organic is based on mimicking nature, not attempting to “improve” her. A view that naturalselective breeding results in “random” or “chance” traits is based on placing a higher value on control than on safety. Another way to view this is to appreciate that natural selective breeding contains within it a safety limit, that will prevent bizarre and sometimes dangerous outcomes. A good example is the transgenic Pea that was developed, but rejected (even by the developer), because it was found to contain a transgenic protein that was processed differently than it’s natural counterpart, and this provoked immune reactions like lung inflammation in mice. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/TPTMMI.php All the best, Dag

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.

Recent Blog Posts

January 27, 2012 - 12:11
January 11, 2012 - 14:09
December 30, 2011 - 00:00
December 29, 2011 - 00:00
December 21, 2011 - 10:48

Twitter